Skip to content

πŸ”Ž Market Structure Comparison

This document is also available as a .docx Word document: Market Structure Overview.docx

Β Perfect CompetitionMonopolistic Competition

Β 

Monopoly

Oligopoly

(I added this column)

Number of FirmsVery manyManyOneFew
Output of Different FirmsIdenticalDifferentiated---Identical or Differentiated
View of PricingPrice takerPrice makerPrice makerDepends
Barriers to Entry/ExitNoNoYesYes
Output and PricingMR=MC=PMR = MC = P
qβˆ—q^\ast at min AC
MR=MCMR = MC
P>MCP \gt MC
qβˆ—q^\ast below min AC
MR=MCMR = MC
P>MCP \gt MC
qβˆ—q^\ast below min AC
Use Game Theory
SR ProfitPositive, zero, or negativePositive, zero, or negativePositive, zero, or negativePositive, zero, or negative
LR ProfitZeroZeroPositive or ZeroPositive or Zero
AdvertisingNeverAlways

Sometimes

(PR Type)

Depends

In perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic comp, you can do MR=MCMR = MC to find the optimal quantity (qβˆ—q^*). In perfect competition, P=MRP = MR, so we can also do P=MCP = MC. However, we can’t do this in monopolistic comp or in monopoly, because in those market structures, P>MRP > MR. Of course, for discrete goods, we produce highest q, where MRβ‰₯MCMR \geq MC.

Perfect Competition
D=P=MR=MCD = P = MR = MC

Monopoly and Monopolistic Comp
D=P>MR=MCD = P > MR = MC

How to β€œsolve” a perfect competition problem:
1.) P=MCP = MC to figure out qβˆ—q^*
2.) Do you shut down (P<AVCP < AVC) or, in LR, exit (P<ATCP < ATC)
3.) Wrap up

How to β€œsolve” a Monopoly problem
1.) MR=MCMR = MC to figure out Q
2.) Draw a line up to the demand curve to figure out P
3.) Wrap up. Profit=TRβˆ’TC=qβˆ—(Pβˆ’AC)\text{Profit} = TR - TC = q^*(P - AC)

How to β€œsolve” a monopolistic competition problem:
Solve Monopolistic Competition just like Monopoly, except that in the long run, the demand curve shifts until it is tangent to AC and P=ACP = AC.

The following diagrams show long run equilibria in Monopolistic Competition and Perfect Competition.

There’s no single diagram. Because of strategic interdependence, we use different game theoretic models to illustrate different oligopolistic scenarios.

Outcome of the Game: Pepsi's Spending On Advertising (Small vs Large) against Coke's Spending on Advertising (Small vs Large). Payoff matrix with dominated strategies crossed out and Nash equilibrium highlighted in yellow at (Large, Large) where both firms earn profit of 3.