π Ron and Cathy break up
Previously, we analyzed the following game:
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
πββοΈ Hey Rob, how did you conclude that Ron prefers Ravel?
See answer
β When Ron is alone at a concert, his payoff is 0.
When Ron is with Cathy at Ravel, he gets a payoff of 2.
When Ron is with Cathy at Chopin, he gets a payoff of 1.
β¨ βRob concludesβ that Ron likes being with Cathy and that he prefers watching Ravel with Cathy to watching Chopin with Cathy.
πββοΈ Who moves first?
See answer
β These are βsimultaneous move games.β Both parties choose their actions/moves without knowing what the other is doing.
A good example of a simultaneous move game is βSplit or Stealβ:
Β£40,015 Split or Steal?
Large investment decisions are often made without the benefit of seeing what your competitors are doing.
Now letβs adjust it. We will assume that Ron and Cathy have broken up. They no longer enjoy being together, but Ron still likes Ravel and Cathy still likes Chopin.
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
Side note: you can verify, to practice, that the NE and Dominant strategies will be identical if you add any number (like 5) to each payoff.
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
Roleplaying as Ron to find Ronβs underlines (best responses)
If Cathy plays Ravel, what is Ronβs best response?
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
If Cathy plays Chopin, what is Ronβs best response?
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
Roleplaying as Cathy to find Cathyβs underlines (best responses)
If Ron plays Ravel, what is Cathyβs best response?
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
If Ron plays Chopin, what is Cathyβs best response?
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
| Cathy β Ravel | Cathy β Chopin | |
|---|---|---|
| Ron β Ravel | , | , |
| Ron β Chopin | , | , |
One equilibrium is when Ron goes to Chopin and Cathy goes to Ravel.
Another equilibrium is when Ron goes to Ravel and Cathy goes to Chopin.
Does Cathy have a dominant strategy?
Does Ron have a dominant strategy?
If both have a dominant strategy, it is a dominant strategy equilibrium.
Is there a Nash Equilibrium?
Feedback? Email munger.e1010@gmail.com π§. Be sure to mention the page you are responding to.